Saturday, May 19, 2012

The Unity of the Roman Church

This is a paper I wrote for my Romans class during my sophomore year during the Spring semester in 2012. This paper was written for Dr. Neil Nelson. The assignment dealt with reading the entire book and recording the instances of Jew and Gentile action within the Roman church. It is easy to see that Paul wished to see the Jews and Gentiles live in harmony with each other, and all other believers, as well as those outside the church and those in government. This is what Christ Himself taught, and what all too many Christians forget. If God is Love, then we are to love as He loved. So let's live like we ought to. I believe that the portions of the book that Paul writes on in unity all come back to a theme of the Gospel.




Unity of the Church
United through the Gospel
1:13 fruit among gentiles and Jews; 1:16 for the Jew first and also for the Greek – Paul sought to gain fruit from the Jewish believers in the surrounding churches in the area near him just as he also hoped to see fruit abound in the Gentile believers. This stated desire was a precursor to his confessions later in the book. He is most assuredly an apostle to the gentiles. That does not keep him from showing a desire to see that his countrymen are saved and growing in the faith and knowledge of Christ that he has become so fond of in devoting his life to. The Gospel does not work periodically with specific races. Because the Gospel went out to the Jews first does not mean that it no longer saves them, nor does it mean that it is no longer supposed to go out to them. But it shows that God operates with an agenda and has specific plans in mind for all the peoples of the Earth. The Jews and Gentiles are united by the Gospel into Christ.
2:9 judgments to both Jew and Gentile; 2:10 God will bless both Jew and Gentiles; 2:14 both Jew and gentile have revealed law from God; 2:24 Jew’s sin causes gentiles to curse God – Just as the message of salvation has gone out to all who would call on the name of Christ, so also must the consequences of unbelief. The consequences of unbelief are clearly laid out for the readers of this letter for the past generation and extends all the way down to today. Those who do believe will receive in unity the blessings of God. God is racially impartial, for man looks at the outward appearance, but God looks at the heart. These people will be judged according to their deeds, and because they are good, they will live in unity as believers and in unity with Christ having died with Him. God sovereignly gave a revealed law to each nation, a law that could hold them accountable on the day of judgment. The name of God has been blasphemed because of the Jews. Now, the Jews must try to reestablish an example as the people of God, so that they may live in unity with the Gentile nations around them.
3:1 God still has special blessing for Israel; 3:9 Jew and gentile are under sin; 3:29 God is God of Jew and Gentile – Paul did not want the differences in blessing to tear apart the different believers in the church. Both are blessed to be united in Christ. Paul simply stressed that the Jews have some different blessings from those of the Gentiles. Paul does stress that both are equally under sin and will walk in unity to death, or in unity to the foot of the cross for God is the God of both Jews and Gentiles.
4:9 Faith not heritage brings salvation; 4:24 both Jews and gentiles imputed righteousness by faith – Paul wanted to make sure that both sets of believers knew that it is faith, not heritage that makes one righteous. This faith is what unified these different groups of people into one functioning body of believers. This is how the church was always to act. As a unified organism. The death of Christ has placed both groups into fellowship with Christ through the imputed righteousness of Christ from the atoning sacrifice. Christ promised to establish His church, and this can only happen through a unified body to a unified Savior.
9:24–26 God calls both Jews and Gentiles his people – Not just Paul, but God, calls all those who believe in Christ his/His people. Paul is united to both groups of believers through blood, but is united all the tighter through the blood of Christ. This is the unity of the believer. Complete familial fellowship with those who share almost no common ground with us, except our risen Savior.
10:12 no distinction between Jew and Gentile; 10:19–21 Gentiles provoke jealousy in Jews because of their blessing of Salvation – This goes back to 3:29. God is God of both Jews and Gentiles. He has no partiality and is willing to lavish love on whomever He wills and whomever kneels at His feet in repentance and faith.
11:11 Jewish jealously that salvation has come to the Gentiles; 11:12 Riches for the Gentiles and so much more for the Jews; 11:16–20 Gentiles grafted in among Jews; 11:21 cast judgment on both Gentiles and Jews; 11:25 Jews blinded until all elect Gentiles receive salvation – The mistake of the Jews has led to the uniting of the Gentiles into fellowship with the Jews. This does not make the tree weaker. It makes it stronger. Their gaffe allowed riches to be sent to the Gentiles, and how much will the fulfillment brought through unity of the church through Christ mean for the peoples of the earth? God tells the groups that they are not spared because they are special in some way, but because they have kept the word of Christ. This love is to unite them in dedication and love. Both groups of people are working hand in hand subconsciously and are fulfilling the will of God as they unite in the body of Christ.
United for Service
12:4–8 unity within the body (as a body) each fulfilling his gifted function; 12:16 be of one mind; 12:18 peace with all men – The body of Christ is designed to first, worship and love God with all their heart, soul, mind, and strength. Second, they are to edify each other every day through the use of their spiritual gifts. Gifts are not for the person who possesses them. Gifts are for the hearers and witnesses who may be unsaved, or who may have been brought into your presence for such a time as this. We are united into one body of believers in the death of Christ. Paul exhorts the believers to live in unity with one another and to avoid pride. Paul’s command to be at peace was a command to both groups of believers so that they may better uplift one another.
13:9 love your neighbor as yourself – What greater way to show unity in the body of believers than when we love each other. This love is to be unconditional. This is self-sacrificial love.
14:1–5 do not judge fellow believers for God is the judge; 14:13 replace judgment with effort to prevent placing stumbling block before brother; 14:14–23 extending love to brothers – God has placed us into union with Him so that we may be united with Him and fellow believers. We are, then, not to judge one another in a hypocritical way, or in ways that are contrary to Scripture. This passage is teaching that one of the best ways to build unity in the church is to respect the desires of others who may have different convictions than others. When it boils down to it, the thing we usually get mad about usually turns out to be no big deal. When believer’s are living in unity, they live in such a way that they are reflecting the light of the Son. They are not causing each other to stumble. This is how the Gospel changes people. Christians must take the initiative and never be afraid to admit that they were wrong. This unity is built through humility, and the desire to not make any of the Christians fall into sin. We extend love to our united brothers and sisters because we show grace when they have different convictions from us and how they take offense to some things that we believe.
15:1 bearing the weaker brother’s burdens; 15:2 please his neighbor; 15:5–6 like-mindedness 15:7–12 glorify God together 15:14 admonish one another15:15–21 preaching to Jews and gentiles; 15:27 love offering committed to each other – The unity of the body is integral to helping others bear one another’s burdens. The spiritually strong are to help and fight for the spiritually weak. This is what any family would do for theirs. We please our neighbor, because we are commanded to, in the form of the command “Love your neighbor.” Like-mindedness shares with it a sense of common values and beliefs that are often underestimated. But it also shares and creates a closer unity for the believers. But the question is “Why does God unite us?” The answer simple: So that we may bring glory to God. We are to glorify God together because we can(as Christians) glorify together. Part and parcel of being in a church is more than just exhortation. It involves not just showing grace to the person who committed the wrong. It involves a unity that places the believer in a position to remind his friend of the promises and love that Christ has for His children. Paul was commissioned to preach to the Gentiles first and foremost, but that did not prevent him from preaching to whatever Jews came across his path. The final act and proof of unity that Paul shared with the believers in Rome was the great love offering that Paul was gathering for the believers in Rome. The unity of Christ can sometimes be best shared when the people of God are placing themselves in risk to carry out the will of God. We are part of the family of God, and in that unity, we are never alone.

God is Light: A study of the Greek word phos, and its use in 1 John 1:5-7

This is a Greek exegetical I wrote for my Greek II class during my sophomore year during my Spring semester at Calvary Bible College for Dr. Neil Nelson. This paper is, in its original form, 14 single spaced pages, but I wish to give you guys the meat of the paper. This paper will deal with what is, in my opinion, one of the greatest challenges to a believer; walking in light. With that in mind, here you go.


In 1 John 1:5 and 7, BDAG lists God as being the transcendent light. This is important because God is the One who illuminates and grants understanding to those whom He wishes to understand. This is the message that was heard from Him. God is the great, amazing, transcendent light. John 1:4 states that the Word contains the life, and the life was the light of men. This seems to imply that light is the source of life. This is consistent with the writings of John because God is Light, and those who are in the Light, and walk in the Light, are those who possess life. This light grants life and illuminates the understanding of unbelievers. The light refers to the eternal life revealed by Jesus, rather than simply the Source of life, for two reasons. First, the sense of revelation is implicit in the “the light,” the source of eternal life, “had come into the world.” The coming of the Source of life reveals life. Second, “the light” is contrasted with “the darkness,” yielding a contrast of the presence or absence of light. The presence of light(which is the Source of life) means the presence of life, while the absence of light means the absence of life(i.e. death)(The New American Commentary, Daniel Akin, 67).


Let's look at some of the historical background and how classical Greek used this word light to better understand this passage.



1. The confession “God is light” has parallels in many different religious and philosophical traditions in antiquity. The Psalmist declared, “The Lord is my light and my salvation; Whom shall I fear(Psalm 27:1)? Philo, the Alexandrian, mystic, Jewish, philosopher, expanded the image: “God is light, and not light only, but the archetype of every other light; or rather, more ancient and higher than any archetype”(De Somniis 1.75; Dodd, 19). Likewise, in the Corpus Hermeticum of the second to fourth centuries one reads Hermes words to his son Tat: “See how the good has been fulfilled, my child, when truth arrives. For envy has withdrawn from us, but the good, together with life and light has followed after truth”(13:9; Boring, 540).

2. Gnostics believed that there was a dichotomy between matter and spirit. Matter was evil inherently while spirit was inherently good. They believed that they could escape the flesh by gaining all the knowledge that they could. To dispel this heresy, John had to prove that Christ was 100% God and 100% man. Christ had perfect fellowship with the Father even though He was in human form. Thus, John proved that the body was not evil inherently(The Letters of John and Jude, Barclay, 11).

3. “To walk” was a common Semitic idiom for “to live.” In Genesis 17:1 God commands Abram, “I am God Almighty; Walk before ME and be blameless”(see also 1 Kings 2:4; 2 Kings 20:3). The elder’s instruction to walk in the light closely resembles the language of the Qumran scrolls: “…walk in perfection in his sight…love all the sons of light…and detest all the sons of darkness”(1 QS 1.8-10; Martinez, 3).

4. A famous section in the Rule of the Community traces the two ways to good and evil spirits: “In the hand of the Prince of Lights is dominion over all the sons of justice; they walk on paths of light. And in the hand of the Angel of Darkness is total dominion over the sons of deceit; they walk on paths of darkness”(1 QS 3:13-4:26; Garcia Martinez, 6).

5. The Epistle of Barnabas 18:1 assumes a similar dualism: “There are two Ways of teaching and power, one of Light and one of Darkness…For over the one are set light-bringing angels of God, but over the other angels of Satan”(cf. Didache 1:1; Apostolic Fathers, LCL 1:401).


Now, this passage is not without its exegetical problems. They are listed here:



K. Problem 1: Can believers lose fellowship with God? Or is lack or fellowship with God merely the problem of an unbeliever?
1.             The issue at stake here is whether fellowship with God is something that can be measured in any way by practice. Does the outward life have to match the inward change? Or is it possible to live nominally, consistently as a Christian and still have fellowship with the Father?
2.             A man’s verbal profession is not necessarily to be believed. It must be tested both in itself, in its relation to the fundamental truth that God is light, and in its bearing upon his behavior(The Epistles of John, Stott, 72). This is the dominant theme of the Epistle. John supplies searching tests by which to judge one who professes and calls himself Christian. Having stated that God is light by His very nature and as a result has fullness of life in Himself,, John is able to deny the claims of fellowship with God to those who live in the darkness of death. The persons who reject Jesus as the incarnate Son of God are the target of these writings of John and are still living in the darkness of death.
Opposed: Since “God is “Light” it follows that a Christian cannot truly claim communion with Him while living in the darkness. As john warned, If we claim to have fellowship with Him yet walk in darkness, we lie and do not live by the truth. John knew, as does every perceptive pastor, that Christians sometimes feign spirituality while engaging in acts of disobedience. Ten times John used darkness to refer to sin.

The opposing side does not accurately account for the fact that God is Light in both illumination and life. I believe that John uses light consistently to denote that God is Light in the sense of life giver based on the Gospel of John, and the epistles. The three errors he treats concern the fact of sin in our conduct, its origin in our nature, and its consequence in our relationship to God. These are the gaffes and foolishness of men who want fellowship with God on cheap terms. These are people who have no understanding of the depravity of the heart of man, the wickedness of sin, and how God wishes to separate man from the claws of death. This is consistent with the following verse in the passage which is a transitional statement. “But if we walk in the Light, as He Himself is in the Light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus cleanses us from our sin.” If we are to have fellowship with God, we must desire to walk in light as God walks in Light. This is where repentance meets belief. If we truly believe in Jesus the Christ, our lives will be radically changed inwardly and outwardly by radical obedience.


So how do we apply this knowledge we've gained from this?



Informative application(dealing with God’s nature).
1.             When we say that God is Light we are not saying that He is simply an illuminator, but a life saver as well. God is not a being of darkness, that’s simply a point we make for emphasis because no Christian will say that God is evil by any stretch of the imagination. What we are trying to get at is that we must relearn what it means to come before a holy God, to stand before a searing light of holy righteousness that burns iniquity, and cleanses the lips of the unclean, as in Isaiah. This light is what purifies that which proceeds out of a man. Once illuminated, it is no longer death that proceeds out of man, but the preaching of the Gospel of Jesus Christ which is the power of salvation to those who believe. This is the message of the light of God.
2.             Directive application(dealing with change outwardly).
Unbelievers cannot share in the fellowship of the Father because of the simple reason that they are not at peace with God. Fellowship is a characteristic of those who are at peace with God and unbelievers simply do not have that. This is what Christ was getting at in Matthew 7. Many will say that they are followers of Christ. There will be many people who call on the name of the Lord and perform many good things in His name. The issue is not what we say, but the issue is do our lives pass the test of practice? John makes simple statements: If our lives do not match the tests of an unbeliever, than we have no fellowship with the Father.
3. Living in the light brings us into fellowship with one another. Because we have been baptized into unity of Christ, and unity of the body, we have a responsibility to be the light bearers that were set on a hill. We are told to let our light shine before men in such a way that they might see our good works. Living in the light of Christ brings us into fellowship with the church.
4. So how do we live in this changed life? We end the same that we would begin. God is light, and not darkness, and through Him we have fellowship. Because God is Light, there is no evil present within Him. Because God is Light, He demands honesty of us. Those who do not practice righteousness are not only unable to understand what is said about Christ, but they are also unable to understand what walking in the Light means. Because believers are in the light, we have been granted understanding through the cleansing agency of the blood of His Son. This should be the complete motivating goal in the lives of believers today. We must live with the desire to do what’s right, but we must also do it because God has commanded us to.


And lastly, my own thoughts as I worked through this passage.



N. Κα στιν ατη γγελία ν κηκόαμεν π ατο κα ναγγέλλομεν μν, τι θες φς στιν κα σκοτία ν ατ οκ στιν οδεμία
John jumps into this section with an impressive, and forceful statement. o yeov fwv estin. This is the message, Κα στιν ατη γγελία ν κηκόαμεν π ατο κα ναγγέλλομεν μν, that mankind has known from the beginning, what they’ve heard, seen, and touched. This is what John was referring to with the term Word of Life in the section before this. This is what was revealed. This is the statement that God is the revealer of life and the Life. This is how our Bible begins. God said, “Let there be light” and there was light. This light was a type of Light. The light in Genesis refers to light that reveals the need for life, while the Light of God reveals the nature of the One who is Holy and capable of giving the Light of Life. This is the Light that illuminates mankind and brings understanding of sin and compels them to bow in repentance and worship Christ as both Lord and Savior. I do not believe that oti should be translated as because(causal) because the message is not given to us “as a result” that God is light. It is given to man to tell man that God is light. It is not cause and effect, but an ever present fact. This is the message! You’ve heard it! Here’s the announcement! God is light!

One of the keys to this passage is the message that God is Light is something that was heard by us from God Himself. kai estin auth h aggelia hn akhkoamen ap’ autou. John is writing to his readers to tell them that this is not something that the Apostles have drummed up as some fantastic story to serve as a crutch to get through life. This is not a feel good story that helps man explain some unexplainable issues. This is a message that the Apostles heard from Christ directly and that message is simple, yet profound. God is a specific Light. He is distinct Light. He is transcendent light, light that is in the element and sphere of the divine(BDAG 1072). He is the light that illuminates the soul and spirit of man. There are several implications that light and darkness carry, just from a cultural sense. Often times, light equals intelligence, while darkness equals ineptitude. This can be seen simply by the slang we use today when we refer to some people on both sides of the fence. We call smart people pretty bright, while people who cannot understand are left in the dark. In entertainment, almost all moral evil is portrayed as darkness, while light is portrayed as moral good. In 2 Corinthians Paul writes that the glory of God is a knowledge of light that shines in the hearts of man. In the Gospel of John, light is invariably revelation of truth.

A parallel can be seen in how Isaiah uses the word light and tells people that they have become so dull to the things of God that they have now confused light with darkness. Paul also employs this metaphor often in his epistles(Eph. 8:14; Rom. 8:11-14; I Thessalonians 5:4-8; I Corinthians 4:5)(The Epistles of John: Stott, 71).

The effect of the light is not only to make them see, but to enable them to walk(Ibid., 72). This is ultimately where the true contrast lies in John’s first epistle: the one who does truth is the one who walks in light, and is of the Light, while the one who does not practice truth does not walk in light, and is of the darkness. So ultimately, the issue boils down to the fact that truth is not contrasted with error, but rather, truth is contrasted with wickedness and unrighteousness.

Ἐὰν επωμεν τι κοινωνίαν χομεν μετ ατο κα ν τ σκότει περιπατμεν, ψευδόμεθα κα ο ποιομεν τν λήθειαν·
In verse 6 John begins his first of three false teacher scenarios. I believe that it is the most drastic of false claims that can be made by a false teacher: fellowship with the Father. “Ἐὰν επωμεν τι κοινωνίαν χομεν μετ ατο κα ν τ σκότει περιπατμεν…” I say this because mankind does not have fellowship with the Father if they are not dead to sin. It should be known that this is not a message to those who are “carnal Christians.” This is a message to false teachers who are unbelievers. John is a writer of contrasting information. Many times he uses contrasts, not to refer to the same groups of people, but to refer to different states of people. For John, there was no third condition or third comparison. John took sin seriously.  John was to the point. Man was either light, or they were darkness. John insists on certain things. 1. He insists that to have fellowship with the God who is light a man must walk in the light and that, if he is still walking in the moral and ethical darkness, of the Christless life, he cannot have that fellowship. This is precisely what the Old Testament had said centuries before. God said, “You shall be holy; for I the Lord your God am Holy”(Leviticus 19:2l cp. 20:7,26). He who would find fellowship with God is committed to a life of goodness which reflects God’s goodness. C.H. Dodd writes: “The church is a society of people, believing in a God of pure goodness, accept the obligation to be good like Him. This does not mean that man must be perfect before he have fellowship with God; if that were the case all of us would be shut out. But it does mean that he will spend his whole life in the awareness of his obligations, in the effort to fulfill them and in penitence when fails. It will mean that he will never think that sin does not matter; it will mean that the nearer he comes to God, the more terrible sin will be to him(The Letters of John and Jude: Barclay, 29).

2. He insists that these mistaken thinkers have the wrong idea of truth. “ψευδόμεθα κα ο ποιομεν τν λήθειαν·” He says that, if people who claim to be specially advanced still walk in darkness, they are not doing the truth. Exactly the same phrase is used in the Fourth Gospel, when is speaks of him, who does the truth(John 3:21). This means that for the Christian truth is never only intellectual; it is always moral. It is not something which exercises only the mind it is something that exercises the whole personality. Truth is not only the discovery of abstract things; it is concrete living; it is also acting. The words which the New Testament uses along with truth are significant. It speaks of obeying the truth(Romans 2:8; Galatians 3:7); following the truth(Galatians 2:14; 3 John 4); possessing the truth(2 Timothy 3:8); of wandering from the truth(James 5:19). There is such a thing as might be called discussion circle Christianity. It is possible to look on Christianity as a series of intellectual problems to be solved and on the Bible as a book about which illuminating information is to be amassed. But Christianity is something to be followed and the Bible a book to be obeyed. It is possible for intellectual eminence and moral failure to go hand in hand for the Christian the truth is something first to be discovered and then to be obeyed. I believe the words ean are both condition statements. If you do this, but don’t do this, then you are not this because He(God) is this. I believe that oti is a content related adverbial referring to what we say. If we say that we have fellowship with God, we will look like light, and not darkness, because we will be practicing light(Ibid., 29-30).

ἐὰν δ ν τ φωτ περιπατμεν ς ατός στιν ν τ φωτί, κοινωνίαν χομεν μετ λλήλων κα τ αμα ησο το υο ατο καθαρίζει μς π πάσης μαρτίας
John transitions from verse 6 to verse 7 with these thoughts in mind. If we say we have fellowship with Him, but walk in darkness, we are lost. This then begs the questions: What puts us into a state of fellowship with Christ? Here are some thoughts. “ἐὰν δ ν τ φωτ περιπατμεν ς ατός στιν ν τ φωτί, κοινωνίαν χομεν μετ λλήλων” “1. Truth is the creator of fellowship. If men are really walking in the light, they have fellowship one with another. No church can be exclusive and still be the Church of Christ. That which destroys fellowship cannot be truth. 2. He who really knows the truth is daily more and more cleansed from sin by the blood of Jesus.” “κα τ αμα ησο το υο ατο καθαρίζει μς π πάσης μαρτίας.” “The meaning is that all the time, day by day, constantly and consistently, the blood of Jesus Christ ought to be carrying out a cleansing process in the life of the individual Christian. The Greek for to cleanse is kayarizein which was originally a ritual word, describing the ceremonies and washings which qualified a man to approach his gods. But the word, as religion developed, came to have a moral sense; and it describes the goodness which enables man to enter into the presence of God. So what John is saying is, “If you really know what the sacrifice of Christ has done and are really experiencing its power, day by day you will be adding holiness to your life and becoming more fit to enter the presence of God.” Here indeed is a great conception. It looks on the sacrifice of Christ as something which not only atones for past sin but equips a man in holiness day by day. True religion is that by which every day a man comes closer to his fellow-men and closer to God. It produces fellowship with God and fellowship with men¾and we can never have the one without the other(Ibid., 30-31).” I believe the adverbial marker ean here is a conditon statement referring to the fact that if we are in the light, we have fellowship with God. I believe this can be tied together with what is written in Romans when Paul says in Romans 5:1 that we have peace with God as an accomplished reality, rather than something that is on the way. wv, I believe,  is a manner statement telling us the way that we should walk. We must walk in the light as Christ is the Light. 



Brick by Brick

This is a paper I wrote for my Ethics class at Calvary Bible College during the Spring semester of 2012 for Dean Cory Trowbridge. Ethics is one of my favorites areas of study and this class was very interesting. It made me think a lot about Not just finding the problem with a scenario, but also finding the cure for the people involved. I think that that concept of finding the cure, not just the problem, has become integral to my worldview at the moment. That's what has hit me so hard in my study of Dietrich Bonhoeffer, apologetics, and ethics. The point of this paper is developing a biblically ethical system in an atheistic culture. With that in mind, here it is.




ATHEIST TO A THEIST
Introduction
            Ethics is a difficult area of study. The difficulty lies in the birth of ethics in a secular culture. For years ethics was a field of study taught solely by the church. The reason for this is because for centuries theists have been the interpreters of the word of God and how it should relate to society. That is because of the centuries long history of Christianity, recognized even by atheists, that was involved in the creation of the American nation. This has since changed. Ethics is now a required field of study for most universities, as well as high school educations. Christian ethics has been supplanted by the study of secular ethical culture.
            As Richard Dawkins would say, “There is a new wave of reason sweeping across America, Britain, Europe, Australia, South America, the Middle East, and Africa.” People are developing ethical systems that no longer see God as a necessary, or even useful, to develop morality. The purpose of this paper will be to present how I would influence an atheistic culture through a biblical worldview by diagnosing the problem with atheistic ethics, the origin of atheistic ethics, the cure for atheistic ethics, and how this cure will be implemented.
            This is not a field that Christians must run away from. Christians must lead the charge into the fight, and also to carry the wounded back to the throne of grace.
The Problem
            Richard Dawkins said in his book, The God Delusion, “The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully.” That is about as to the point as one can say it. This, ultimately, is the great problem to solving an atheistic society. The problem is and always will be sin. Sin is what causes mankind to not only fail in its understanding of ethical society, but also in the birthplace of ethics as a whole.
            Atheistic ethics can find its place in various ethical systems. The decline of ethics begins and ends when one fails to see God as the source of morality. Acknowledgement of God just is not enough to develop a proper ethical system. According to recent polls, almost 95% of Americans acknowledge that God exists. All humans will also acknowledge that mankind has a serious problem. Richard Dawkins even says, “Let us try to teach generosity and altruism, because we are born selfish.” Atheists decide to deal with this problem through various methods.
            The first is that they try to eliminate God from the equation. This is where an atheist tries to win the argument, ultimately. They try to establish some form of ethical origin that does not involve the Bible, or the God of the Bible. Atheists believe that ethics from the basis of religion is an impossibility since the end goal is pleasing God, getting into heaven, or accessing Nirvana, etc., which is folly because these places do not exist. Basically, the problem for an atheist is living for a purpose that ultimately does not take shape in present form. This is where their will always be a disconnect between Christians and atheists. Godly Christians have no need for present reward since they are to store up treasures in heaven. Atheists, on the other hand, believe that ethics is centered around an end game that can be achieved at some point in this world. But no matter what it is, it is something that can and should be determined by human kind. The crux of this belief for atheists rests upon the foundation of free will. For atheists, ethics is relative because all men have the free will to decide what is right for them but not for anyone else. Absolutes are for bondage thinkers.
            What this means is that culture, behavior, and utilitarian ethics determines what is truly ethical when God is eliminated, if that is even possible. An examination of how each of these core systems impacts atheistic ethics will now take place.
            Cultural relativism believes that the cultures of where we are raised ultimately determines what man holds dear and raises up as ethically acceptable. For example, most people raised in America today believe that God exists. Richard Dawkins would maintain that this would not be the case if most of these people were raised in early century Greece. They would not believe in God, they would believe in Apollo, Zeus, Mars, Ares, or Aphrodite. This is because the culture would dictate what is acceptable and what is not.
            Behavior ethics believes that men cannot help themselves when it comes to how they respond to stimuli. Basically, men are no different from animals. We react off instincts just as animals do. The purpose of ethics becomes pleasurable stimulus to bring about the desired effect from people.
            Utilitarian is the trickiest of atheistic systems. It incorporates a lot of scriptural truth, but without the scriptural purpose. Ultimately, the greatest good stems from the greatest happiness. Thus, if eliminating an entire group of people who believe in the God of the Bible brings about the greatest happiness of all, mass murder becomes the de facto good. Utilitarianism dictates that happiness is good and good is determined by our senses. Rules do not determine right or wrong because rules can only effect intent as opposed to result. Result is the determiner of what is right and wrong. Pain is the greatest evil.
The Cure
            The cure is now the greatest of the problems. Atheism is the worst of all religious systems. Its god is the human intellect. The thing that makes atheism so difficult to combat, is the simple reason that it almost forces Christians to fight on their terms. Christians almost cannot use the Bible, a reference to God, or any apologetic involving a spiritual source or reference point because to an atheist, these simply do not exist. This is a big problem because atheism no longer wishes to simply say that gods, or God, is acceptable just so long as He is not the only way. Atheism wants to eradicate religion completely.
So, how can Christians try to administer a cure to a society that does not really wish to be cured with the cure?
Ultimately, there is not a whole lot that Christians can do in and of themselves. That does not mean that Christians should just give up and call it a day either. Here are some of the best steps that Christians can do in order to save a country imploding on its own brilliance.
1. Pray. Prayer is something that cannot be underestimated in this culture. Prayer is something that atheists cannot do. Prayer is something that an atheist will never be able to partake in and experience the calming nature that prayer and communion with the Father has. Paul commanded Christians to pray without ceasing. Paul commanded believers to pray for all who are in authority no matter what they believe. Prayer is the hammer that God uses to soften the hearts of man(I Thessalonians 5:17; I Timothy 2:1).
2. Apologetics. Apologetics is the study of the defense of Christian faith. The study of apologetics will greatly aid Christians in how they deal with the atheistic worldview of ethics. Apologetics provides the study of the empirical proofs that atheists crave. Apologetics brings Scripture onto the same playing field as whatever atheists can throw at it from a purely intellectual sense, at least. When the empirical veracity of the Bible can be proved to atheist, just enough to recognized as a historical, believable, reliable document. When this happens, Christians can move on from the petulant realm of debate and into the relevant realm of changing the culture through changing the people. This change in people is brought about by the third point to the cure(I Peter 3:15).
3. The Gospel. The Gospel is the message of salvation. When it comes down to it, Christians cannot meet the atheists on their playing field. A sad reality is that most atheists understand their position better than most Christians understand theirs. Christians must then rely on the workings of Christ in the lives of those whom the Gospel is shared with. This is how faith has always been brought about. Faith comes by hearing and hearing the word of Christ. Carl Sagan once said that there is not enough proof to either prove, or disprove the God of the Bible. All that scientists say is that with great claims, comes great demands for evidence. Ultimately, the Gospel is the only thing that can change the culture. Mankind is incurably religious and cannot develop a system of ethics at all because is not something that can exist devoid of God. Now, how must Christians implement this change?
Implementation
            Atheists need empirical proof for everything. Faith is a crutch to all who are not willing to work hard enough to discern what is actual truth, according to the atheist mind. Faith, to atheistic cultures, is the most heinous of all crimes that must be punished. Because of this, the cures listed above must all be expressed through the format of relationship.
One of Christianity’s most iterated, and sadly least kept, principles is the concept of loving our enemies, and blessing those that persecute us. Imagine how far one can go in a relationship with an atheist by proving that the change enacted in the Christian is from God. This is what all atheists want, and ironically, what God wants at the same time. God wants faith with action. Atheists want our faith to match our actions because faith is often the tool of manipulation among the lower, less intelligent classes. That battle starts with Christians praying for those who are our apparent enemies. This even extends to asking those who shun the name of Christ how we can pray for them. Only the staunchest of religious bigots would shun the goodwill of another human, be it from God or not.
Atheists hate Christianity because they are oftentimes the least inquisitive people who have no real reasoning abilities. 99% of all atheists are in fact brilliant people. Their ability to reason and debate from a logical perspective is incredible. This is why Christians must learn apologetics. Christians have a responsibility to learn how to be intelligent thinkers who can defend their beliefs rationally, logically, and most importantly, from the Bible that most claim to know yet do not. Atheists know enough about the Bible to be dangerous, but not enough to interpret most passages accurately. They can find their way to the dangerous problem texts for Christians to interpret who are not well versed in the historical implications of most of these verses. This is why Christians must know how to use their weapons well, and instill doubt in atheists with the mind God gave them. Ultimately, apologetics will not win someone to Christ. Paul Watson once said, “Theistic proofs are great because they rattle cages, but ultimately, they cannot save.” How true this is, as this brings me to my final point.
The Gospel is called the good news for a reason. It shatters the walls of the ignorant, it reaches out to the drowning, and rouses the dead to life. Because ethics cannot be established apart from God, God must be centric in the lives of men. It is God who instills in man the desire for ethical parity that coincides with an established order. That is why ethical systems have problems and are self-defeating when they exist outside the boundaries of God. Cultural Relativism cannot work because it cannot handle the idea of absolute truth. Behaviorism cannot work because it ignores the reason why there are Buddhists converting to Christianity inside the Buddhist community. As Justin Martyr once said, “If you want proof of the reality of God, oh emperor, look at the people!” Justin Martyr believed that the greatest apologetic of God’s existence in ethics was the very fact that the people who followed God were moral and good people. People who lived what they believed, and lived what Christ taught. So many Christians have lost the plot when it comes to this. Christianity is not lived in a bubble. Christ needs His people to get out into the world, into the business world, into the education system, into the universities, into the sports arena, and into politics and live as Christ would have them live. Christians cannot expect the culture to change for the better ethically if the very people who claim to be transformed by the renewing power of Christ do not live any different than those who have not had the same transformation. Every time a pastor is found in his office dying from pornography addictions the atheists have just one more opportunity to blaspheme Christ and turn their backs on Him and His people. Every time a Christian rains fire and brimstone on every unbeliever that comes across their path, the atheist sees nothing more than spiritual racism. I am not saying that we must be passive about sin, we must state when sin is wrong, but we cannot instantly condemn to hell, but rather, attempt to help the same way that Christ did. Present the cure!
That is the only way that the culture can be changed. Bring the cure to the people. We cannot make them confess, but I do not want unsaved people to stand at the judgment seat of Christ and say back to Christ, “Your servant, Ross Harris, never once told me about you.” How terrifying is that thought?
Conclusion
            As stated above, the culture can only change when the source of the culture changes. Since mankind has set up counterfeit gods to replace the One True God, it is the job of Christians to present the ethical solution to corruption by first living out the ethical solution, defending the ethical solution, and presenting the ethical solution. When this is done, it is no longer the responsibility of the Christian, but the responsibility of mankind to respond to the Gospel. When it comes down to it, we are not commanded to change the culture, but to pray for those who can. The culture will change on its own when Christ is the center of culture. This is what all believers look forward to when we come into the millennial kingdom of Christ and His reign for 1,000 years before entering into the greatness of the never ending eternality of the rule of God the Father. What a day that will be. Maranatha.

Friday, May 18, 2012

Radical Obedience

This is a paper I wrote for our Great Christian Thinkers class at Calvary Bible College for my Spring semester in 2012 during my Sophomore year. This paper was written for Mr. Tim Smith. This class was devoted to the study of the circumstances and the theology surrounding the life of Dietrich Bonhoeffer. This is one paper of many that each of the students were required to write. I was fortunate enough to have the chance this paper about a topic that I am so personally fond of. The concept of incredible obedience to God for seeing something worthwhile in the unsalvageable. Bear in mind that I do not agree with everything that Dietrich Bonhoeffer believed, but I cannot disagree with his love for God, his desire to obey at all costs, his belief in the Lordship of Christ, his love for humanity, and his desire to fix people through the grace of Christ. So, here you go.




Radical Obedience
            There is no point in sugar coating any statement made by Dietrich Bonhoeffer. He has not given theology students that luxury. What students must realize is that they are dealing with a man who has such a proper view of the God of the universe and how small he, and every other being is. Bonhoeffer is a rare man. Many people seek to find faults in mankind and with any system, but Bonhoeffer strove to find remedies to the faults. This could be seen in the way he preached and the way he stressed the sovereignty of God in all facets of life. Perhaps the greatest of these areas was when it came to discipleship.
            The first two chapters looked at describing what grace and the call to discipleship looked like. The next three chapters focus on obedience to that irresistible call. What was obedience to Bonhoeffer? Obedience was something that one did because Christ had done a work in that person’s life. Obedience, for Bonhoeffer, could cover salvation in response to Christ’s call, or it could cover the sanctifying process. For Bonhoeffer, obedience was and always will be tied directly to faith. The faith of man is never better on display than when it is demonstrated through the obedience to Christ.[1]
“Again, when Peter was called to walk on the rolling sea,
he had to get up and risk his life. Only one thing was required
in each case¾to rely on Christ’s Word, and cling to it as
offering greater security than all the securities of the world.”[2]
            For Bonhoeffer, the word of God is something far more than a plea to live for righteousness. It is a command from the incarnate God-Man. Scripture never makes a request of the unrepentant. Scripture never seems to reason with the lost so as to negotiate a peaceful surrender. These are not the actions of the God of all creation. The Apostle Paul states in Acts 17:30,31 a command from God that all men are to repent. The question must then be asked, what is this repentance?
            For Bonhoeffer, repentance was nothing less than radical obedience.
“But no, he went away sorrowful.
Because he would not obey, he could not believe.”[3]
            This is a sobering truth for all Christians. John 3:18 says that those who do not believe in Christ have already received their judgment. Obedience to Christ’s calling is never in control of the decisions of man. Christ never asked mankind to obey Him legalistically. Christ has not asked of Christians to sell all their possessions because material wealth is of the devil. He has asked for radical obedience, obedience that does not require material wealth, obedience that does not require potential followers to cross items off of their bucket list before taking up the cross for the first time, obedience that is so dedicated to the incarnate God-Man that it radiates a love that is so bright that the evil hate it and the righteous flock to it, obedient love that is so devoted to Christ that it almost comes across as hate since a Christian’s love must pale in comparison to the radical obedience to Christ.
The Subtle Joy
            Christians are called to be like Christ. That is a truth that cannot be argued. Though it is true that Christians cannot be like Christ in His perfections, Christians must be like Christ in how they live and act. This is most beautifully expressed in how the incarnate God-Man suffered and was rejected.
“Had He only suffered, Jesus might still have
been applauded as the Messiah. All the sympathy
and admiration of the world might have been focused
on His passion.”[4]
            What Christians must understand is that Christ did not just suffer pain physically during His passion week. The people rejected Christ as an outworking of their father, the devil, whom Christ accused accurately the Pharisees of being just a short time ago. This was ultimately what Satan had done to God. He rejected Christ, and the sovereignty of God, and was used by God to cause Christ to suffer and be rejected at the hands of His creation. This is the relationship that Bonhoeffer tried to stress with dying to Christ. Dying on the cross necessitates being despised and rejected by men.[5] If suffering and rejection is what makes Christ the Christ, then suffering and rejection is what makes a disciple a disciple since we are to be crucified with Christ. The suffering and death of Christ is so integral to the theology of the Church. Christians need the death and resurrection of Christ for salvation as empirical proof against a world gone mad as it drowns in a quasi wave of “reason.” The fact that so many churches were trying to disprove the resurrection of Christ proves that the Suffering Servant at its very nature, is a scandal to most churches.[6] But it is this very suffering and rejection that is a source of joy for the believer.
“Only the man who is dead to his own will
can follow Christ.”[7]
            Every command of Christ is a desire to put to death the desires of the flesh and to put on the actions of the regenerated man. Christ demands radical obedience because the Father answered Christ’s prayer to have the “cup” taken from Him by having Him pass through the ordeal. So also, Christians will have the “cup” of tribulation taken from them as they live through it.
Personal Attention
            When Christ described Himself as the Good Shepherd, He stated that if one were wandering astray, he would leave the others and go out looking for that one lost sheep. This begs the question, how does discipleship occur on a personal level?
“Through the call of Jesus men become individuals.
Willy-nilly, they are made to decide, and that decision
can only be made by themselves. It is no choice of their
own that makes them individuals: it is Christ
who makes them individuals by calling them.”[8]
            Paul wrote to the Corinthian church that he determined to know nothing but Christ and Him crucified. This is what Bonhoeffer was trying to get at, at its core. Man is at a state of hostility with all of creation, whether God or man. Man needs an mediator who can restore relationship to the King of Glory. Only a fait accompli action of Christ can separate man, as a disciple, from a world of material and relational chaos. This is what happens when the words of Christ are no longer an ideal or an ethical system, but rather, as the words of Mediator who restores relationship to the hearers of the call to discipleship. It is this call, that severs ties to the world and places Christians into relationship with the God-Man. To love one an exterior relationship more than the relationship to Christ, is to hate Christ, according to Bonhoeffer.[9]
            Some may say that since Christ has paid the penalty of the sin of Christians that they need not worry since Christ has established relationship with them, they can go back to the relationships they just left. What many Christians forget is that this is the same world that crucified the King of Glory. When Christians embrace this, they embrace merely a justification of sin, and not the sinner.[10]
Conclusion
            As we can see in this section of The Cost of Discipleship, Bonhoeffer was stressing how the outward change meets the inward change in the life of the believer. This is such an important concept to understand for the Christian community today. We live in an era where most accusations of legalism are, in actuality, someone just trying to encourage someone to abide to a standard of holiness. This is the point that Bonhoeffer tried to stress. Faith is so much more than a mere mental assent, as most in the church see it today. Faith is obedience, and obedience is faith.
            I believe that the church should study this book since we live in an age of Christianity where discipleship is in most circles, vague. Most people view discipleship solely as a man-to-man relationship. This is what Bonhoeffer was trying to get away from. As always, he got back to the root of the issue. Discipleship is a vertical relationship first, and a horizontal relationship second.
            The church must realize that we are facing an epidemic of believers who do not understand that they are clinging to ties that separate them from a firm relationship with Christ. This could be the form of anything that supplants the King of Glory in the life of a believer. Christ does not desire acquaintance. He desires intimate, personal relationship.
“…the same Mediator who makes us individuals is also
the founder of a new fellowship. He stands in the centre
between my neighbour and myself. He divides, but He also unites.
Thus although the direct way to our neighbor is barred, we now
find the only real to him the way which passes through the Mediator.”[11]


“Radical obedience
begot radical relationship,
                                                which will beget radical joy.”


[1] Dietrich Bonhoeffer, The Cost of Discipleship, 64.

[2] Ibid., 79

[3] Ibid., 80
[4] Ibid., 86-87

[5] Ibid., 87
[6] Ibid., 87

[7] Ibid., 90

[8] Ibid., 94
[9] Ibid., 97

[10] Ibid.,
[11] Ibid., 100